Belle Femme focus blended and stitched

Howdy all, welcome to my blog. In response to a few requests my first entry will describe the making of the photograph titled Belle Femme.

bf-final2
In my experience the best photos are the ones whereby I have a vision in mind before I create the image. That is not to say that all my favorite shots were envisioned ahead of time, I have chanced upon subjects and captured keepers. My vision for Belle Femme was one of a very large framed print that would have incredible detail even when viewed close up. My subject was a local wildflower called the blue flag, iris versicolor. Wildflowers interest me far more than cultivated varieties and this flower is one of my favorites.

To make the image I had to overcome two limitations of my camera, resolution and depth of field. The native resolution of my camera was pretty good at 16 megapixels but to make a print 30 inches high as sharp as I wanted would require more.  To create an image of more than 16 megapixels with my camera required a technique called stitching.

The next camera limitation, depth of field, needs a little explaining. My subject was relatively small, about 2 inches wide. When photographing subjects this small the area that is actually in focus is very shallow. The area behind and ahead of the focus plane are blurred. I employed a technique called focus blending in order to render the entire flower in focus.

This is how it was done. To employ the techniques that I needed required multiple photos of the flower and a very calm controlled environment. I have made some photos by going into the field in the calm hours of early morning but in this case I needed the atmosphere of my studio. My mother happened to have some of the flowers in her yard. The night before the planned shoot I picked a plant with two unopened blossoms. The following morning in my studio I had a beautiful blossom open, and because it was inside all night the flower was undamaged and clean.

My next challenge was to come up with a pleasing lighting arrangement. I decided to use a technique called cross polarization. Cross polarization reduces bright reflections on the flower and reveals the color and fine details better.
For my first series of photos I framed just the upper part of the flower.
vr4m9425

The first photo was focused on the nearest part of the flower. Subsequent photos were focused just a little further away in small steps.

untitled-1

When my focus point reached the base of the first petal I cut it off so that it would not interfere when defocused on the furthest petal.
vr4m9458

After the first series of photos were complete I angled the camera down and created the next series, clipping petals as I went.

vr4m9562

44

It required 45 minutes and 272 photos to cover the entire photo in four separate series.  After that the project became much less fun. I had to manually rescale and blend each of the photos into one finished photo.

Here is a bit more detail on how the blending took place. The first photo that I opened was focused on the part of the petal nearest to the camera. The next photo opened was focused just a tiny bit further away. I would then take the second image and drag it on top of the first image (I used Photoshop for the project). The second image had slightly less magnification than the first, since it was focused further away, and needed to be upscaled slightly to match the size of the first image. I then upscaled just the second image using the transform image, image scale function to about 100.2%. The upscaled image then needed to be positioned exactly over the first image. Next I chose the eraser tool. I adjusted the brush to a medium hardness and a size of about 30 pixels. I then carefully erased the blurred areas that were just adjacent to the sharp areas on the top image to reveal the in focus areas on the bottom image. This procedure was repeated for every image until the entire series was in focus. Each image required a different amount of scaling and it was trial and error until the right size was found.

For the next series of images the framing of the flower was lower on the plant. These images were blended with the first series of images, so in effect from here on the images are focus blended and stitched at the same time.

The completed photo is 61 megapixels in size and 16 bit. It took me 5 months and over 50 hours to complete the project.  Most nights I didn’t work on it since I found that I needed to be in the right state of mind and alert to work without mistakes. In the end I used only 151 of the original 272 images. Here is a 100% crop from the photo.  The white spots in the upper left are pollen grains.
crop

blue-flag-final-crop-1

After putting that much effort into the photograph I was reluctant to show it to anyone. I was afraid the photo would get just a ho hum reception and I would feel that the effort may have been wasted. I think the photo was worth the effort and I encourage anyone about to undertake such a project to pick your subject well so that the effort is fully appreciated.
Dan

_anb20533

19 Responses to “Belle Femme focus blended and stitched”

  1. Shel Michaels says:

    How generous of you to share both your methods and your advice!! Thanks!! 8^)

    And, what a _great_ result!!!!

  2. Roger says:

    Sweet!! Thanks for including this as your first post =) Well worth the wait!

    Did I mention that your photo turned out awesome? Well it did.

    {}
    KT

  3. Sharon Ward says:

    Dan
    I guess I never realized how much time you put into one image. That blows my mind really. I am used to photographing people with not a whole lot of post processing involved so this was really a different approach for me to read about. Kudos to you for having so much patience to create this image. It is beautiful.

  4. Sally Turner says:

    Hi Dan,
    All your hard work and effort produced a truly amazing and breath-taking photo. Your ingenuity and patience never fail to amaze me. Thanks for sharing the technique and the result.
    ST

  5. Lisa Schofield says:

    Dan,
    Your photo is absolutely gorgeous.

    Thank you for sharing the entire process involved. The blogs step by step photo format works really well. It is detailed enough so that anyone can try this technique as long as they are willng to summon up the dedication to see it all the way through. I admire your patience and even find the photoshop project involved totally intriguing.

  6. Maria OBrien says:

    Thanks Dan! I love your work, in fact it was after seeing your work at a show that lead me to the club - hoping to learn from you - this is a great idea! And I agree, very generous!

    Thanks!
    MO

  7. K Barnes says:

    Hi Dan,

    WOW….another exquisite image. Such impressive work. Ditto to others comments…thank you so much for sharing your methods.
    Personally, I find the precision of this kind of work is daunting. I can’t imagine trying it, unless I could figure out a way to experiment with, say, THREE images??? So happy there are braver souls out there who ARE willing to try this kind of work. Without a doubt, it’s always a thrill to be able to view these lovely flowers with such clarity and magnification. KKB

  8. Ruth OConnor says:

    Dan, Whew! No way can I describe my admiration for your work. It is astronomically sophisticated but my appreciation is enormous. My horizons are limited but you encourage me to go forward with the tools I have. Ruth

  9. admin says:

    Thanks for the nice words everyone. If you have any suggestions for further topics let me know.
    Dan

  10. Ken Doo says:

    Outstanding work, Dan!

    ken

  11. Norm White says:

    Dan -
    Let me add my kudos and my admiration to those of everyone else. The finished photo is truly beautiful. I am absolutely in awe of the care, patience and precision that went into creating this image. Your description makes clear the kind of dedication that makes you the artist you are. Thank you for sharing both the image and the explaination of your technique with us.
    - Norm

  12. Thomas says:

    That’s a fine image, compliments. Just curious about focus bracketing: Have you tried with TufusePro?
    http://www.tawbaware.com/tufusepro.htm

  13. admin says:

    No I haven’t but I’ll look into it.
    I have tried Helicon focus and I feel I can do a better job manually.
    Dan

  14. I am speechless…… truly……. the work involved…… and such a magnificent result!

  15. George Casey says:

    Your work is excellent and artistic! The art show organizer, tragically, may be well-intentioned, but is not well-informed about art.

  16. Bob Towery says:

    An incredible technique and execution. That’s a real labor of love. Nicely done!

  17. Kurtis Kronk says:

    Beautiful photo, but the fact that you put so much work into this makes me like it so much more. I can only imagine how tedious that must have been manually stitching 270+ photos. Good grief! I would be tempted to just rent the highest-end Hasselblad and save myself the trouble, haha. How many hours did you spend on post-processing, approximately, I’m curious?

    And as a sidenote… I thought I’d heard of some programs that will automate the process of combining focus-stacked images. Cutting off petals might throw those programs off, though, I guess, and you probably got a higher quality result anyways.

  18. admin says:

    Thanks Kurtis. I spent over 50 hours putting it together. The Hasselblad wouldn’t have helped the depth of field.
    Dan

  19. Atsah Images says:

    Just read your article and story about how you made the flower photograph. This is a fantastic photograph. I am going to have to try your technique. Thank you for sharing. BTW I totally agree with you about your article about the art community and their mis-conception fine art.